Weber_Valley

Weber Heights Association facts exposed.

Introduction,

The Reed's grant deed is the last in a chain of title transfers as seen in (EXHIBIT 1). That exhibit 1 provides recorded title transfer document numbers and dates related to the 1968 Record of Survey 53/40 parcel #2. Those specifically recorded and legally granted real property Civil Rights are to the commonly known address 44100 Ginger Circle Hemet, CA 92544 and they did not name a Weber Valley Heights Association as a benefactor anywhere per CA civil codes. There are three separately recorded Grants of Easement deeds related to Mr. Reed’s deeded real property rights and those three legally recorded grant of easements rights of authority do not name a Weber Valley or Weber Heights anything as being granted any rights of authority or enjoyment of benefactor rights thereto the easements.

The following recorded files are copies of the archived records from the County of Riverside real property records starting on12/1965 to 11/1968 (EXHIBIT 2) Near the bottom on 7/30/1969 in yellow Thomas Johnson (Reed's predecessor, (seller)) signed a sale/purchase agreement with William Schickles (buyer) See Exhibit 1. The next file is from 7/1968 to 1/1970 (EXHIBIT 3) The County of Riverside Recorder ledgers then go from 1/17/1970 to 5/19/1975. (EXHIBIT 4) and then 6/3/1975 to 7/29/1977 (EXHIBIT 5) therefrom 6/1976 to 3/1979. (EXHIBIT 6). From 12/1965 to3/1979 Weber Heights Non-profit did not become an owner or a recorded benefactor of rights or authority to any real property, so proven by the County of Riverside property transfer ledgers. The fact remains those legally recorded County of Riverside real property transfer records dated from 12/1965 to 3/1979 absolutely 100% failed to name Weber Heights Non-profit Association anywhere.

After your careful review of the three Grants of Easements and Reed’s Grant deed, try to answer these exceedingly important questions;

1. How did any real property rights transfer to a fictitious union as a singular standalone business entity?
2. What year did the recorded property rights transfer to the HOA name?
3. What is the document number that Granted the mutual benefit singular Home Owners Association ("HOA") rights of authority?
4. Who granted any legally recorded rights of authority or dominant control to the singular HOA?
5. Who are the operators of the business according to County of Riverside doing business as (DBA) records per the official Office of Recorder archived records?

Those questions remains unanswered because the legally recorded transfer of rights to the singular standalone business never happened.

Fraud happened,

Official records prove Weber Valley non-profit Association never materialized per its 1973 foundation of Association documents.The California Secretary of State provided absolute proof that non-profit association had failed to follow the original 1973 foundation of formation statements. On 7/14/2014 this letter arrived from the Office of California Secretary of State, (EXHIBIT 7).

This is a list of real property APN's related to multiple properties herein question, (EXHIBIT 8) the proceeding exhibit 8 includes a short brief about a section of land in Riverside County that is said to be governed by a phony Home Owners Association, (HOA).

I am being extorted, let me prove it.

My name is Gregory Reed, my wife is Sherry Reed. Her and I now own Record of Survey 53/40 parcel #2 as per County record #124200 recorded on 12/20/1968 seen as Assessors Parcel Number (APN #)571040002 (Exhibit 9). The common address is 44100 Ginger Circle Hemet, CA. Our real property has three separate grants of easement related to the land. Those three (3) grants of easements run as an appurtenance to the lands so named in each of the separately recorded documents as seen in the order of recordings exhibit 10, exhibit 11 and exhibit 12.

The following three files are those legally recorded Grants of Easements.

1.) 1985 by Charles Reed Jr. Based on fraud as written in the 1973 bylaws at Section 8 the claim of ownership of two wells.. In 1982 a merit-less Lis Pendens action was filed and it resulted in this Grant of Easement. The easement absolutely and 100% fails to mention “Weber anything” anywhere within the document. (EXHIBIT 10)

2.) 1990 by Charles Campbell In May of 1990 the well was illegally drilled. 6/12/1992 for the first time and without the required permit, a well pump was fitted with 588 ft. of electrical wiring and 588 ft. of pipeline then illegally energize. (EXHIBIT 11)

3.) 1993 by Ronald Mark Leuschen See California Regulations Related to Drinking Water. Section 64216 states "Mutual Associations Prohibited. No state small water system which was not in existence on 11/12/1991 shall be issued a permit to operate if the water supplier is an unincorporated association organized under Title 3 (commencing with Section 20000) of Division 3 of the Corporations Code". Why was this law not followed? (EXHIBIT 12)

These following officially recorded documents provide real property locations and sizes. All of the plotted locations are a portion of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 4 Township 7 in Riverside County CA.

12/3/1968 Record of Survey 53/37 doc. #117559 (EXHIBIT 13 )

12/20/1968 Record of Survey 53/40 doc. #124200 (EXHIBIT 14)

1/3/1969 Record of Survey 53/43 doc. #849 (EXHIBIT 15)

1/9/1969 Record of Survey 53/47 doc. #2420 (EXHIBIT 16)

1/20/1969 Record of Survey 53/51 doc. #5706 (EXHIBIT 17)

1/24/1969 Record of Survey 53/53 doc. #782 (EXHIBIT 18)

This is where the frauds of Weber Heights non-profit Association first started.

On 10/18/1973 a group of people calling themselves "Weber Height nonprofit Association" held a meeting regarding its bylaws.
The group consisted of land owners and wanted to be land owners, all of whom were attempting to start a non-profit Home
Owners Association ((HOA). For some reasoning they failed to complete the goals set forth at that Oct. 18, 1973 meeting. This very important fact provides proof the group leaders failed to register the non-profit with the Secretary of State (EXHIBIT 19) as stated, required at page 2 (EXHIBIT 20) and thereby recorded in the 11/18/1973 minutes of foundation and formation.

Page 1 The name was stated to be Weber Heights non-profit Association. (EXHIBIT 21)
Page 2 Reading page 2, the intention clearly stated "This must be done before we can proceed any further". (EXHIBIT 22)

That fact is a valid point of interest; as a legal standalone entity the group did not possess ownership title for the real property as claimed in the 1973 bylaws. Nor did the Association own recorded rights of authority to control two wells or the water rights thereto and/or any utility service rights to or from real properties located within the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 4. Currently the County of Riverside Recorder’s Office records 100% fails to have any recorded rights granting the association as a union any rights to act in the capacity that was noted within those 1973 incomplete bylaws or the 2002 revised bylaws and or the 2012 revised bylaws.

As mentioned above, the group required recording its bylaws with the Secretary of State and that never happened, therefore, the initial association never took shape as a recorded non-profit, nor was the want to be HOA ever shown as a legally recorded CA 501 c 3 non-profit within the CA Secretary of State records.

However the Bylaws for the first association known as Weber Heights Non Profit Association were formulated and embedded with fraud.

Page 1. The name of an Association is on page one. "Weber Heights Non-profit Association". (EXHIBIT 24)
Page 2. Legal ownership to two wells did not exist then or now as was claimed at section 8. (EXHIBIT 25)
Page 3. An officer was missing from the board of directors as is required within those 1973 official bylaws.Weber Heights Non-profit bylaws were not completely agreed upon. (see pg. 3) Pg.3. (EXHIBIT 26)
The result of the 1973 bylaws was a "DEFUNCT" association right from the start.

Without legally entitled or recorded real property rights from 12/1965 to 3/1979, Moot Weber Heights Non-profit Association.

Note these facts;
1.Those 1973 bylaws did not have a section that allowed for any new member to join.
2.This is a plot map with locations of the original named 1973 directors and the related real properties. (EXHIBIT 27)

On 11/4/1982 After the failure to form an official Weber Heights non-profit 501(c)(3) association in 1973 and nine years
later in 1982, a merit-less notice of Lis Pendens was filed on Charles Reed Jr's property AKA 44240 East Benton as record #171171. (EXHIBIT 28) This is a fact; Weber Height nonprofit Association was not named on Page 1 , Page 2 or Page 3. of the action. Look at the named plaintiffs compared to the original 1973 founding directors . (EXHIBIT 29)

Note this fact, on 11/22/1982 Wilson and Loire Cantrell and Elater and Chalortt Wood become land owners 18 days after the Oct. 4, 1982 Lis Pendens was filed. (EXHIBIT 30)

Therefore this question remains, what gave the the Cantrell's any rights to join the Lis Pendens? How did the rights to join the claim pass prior to legally entitled ownership rights of authority to real property passed? That fact alone provides proof the Lis Pendens was meritless and anyone willing to add their name into the action was allowed to do so.

3/131985 an Attorney's notice letter was delivered to property owners. (EXHIBIT 31) A copy of that letter is on file with DEH. The Weber Heights non-profit and the newly formed Weber Valley Heights Water Association are not named anywhere within that letter. Therefore, how did the rights to the well property pass to a defunct non existing Non-Profit Association? Simply stated, they didn't.

Grants of Easement fact #1; on 3/15/1985 Mr. Charles Reed Jr. signed a Grant of easement record # 53702 and Weber Valley is not and was not listed as a legally entitled rights owner. (EXHIBIT 32)

Mr. Charles Reed Jr. then sold his property. Note: Not all of the named grantees are the same as shown in that 10/4/1982 Lis Pendens. In my opinion, he, Mr. Charles Reed Jr., no relation to Greg or Sherry Reed was extorted into signing a grant of easement in order to sell his real property. As mentioned earlier Weber Heights Non Profit Association never possessed real property ownership rights as was claimed in those 1973 fraudulent based bylaws on pg. 2 at section 8. (EXHIBIT 33)

Legal Facts

11/3/1989 CA Water Code 13801 section 2.1.1 applied to all new wells. Around May 1, 1990 Charles Campbell had a new well drilled at 44100 Ginger Circle AKA Record of Survey 53/40 par 2 APN # 571-040-002 and he did so without the required County DEH issued permit as shown in County of Riverside Ordinance 682 at Section 3 effective 12/31/1989. County of Riverside ORDINANCE NO. 682 regulates the construction of new wells. At Section 3 are PERMIT REQUIREMENTS it states “A. No person, entity, or agent, contractor, subcontractor, representative, or employee thereof, shall dig,
drill, bore, drive, reconstruct or destroy (1) a well that is to be, or has been, used to produce or inject water, (2) a cathodic protection well, (3) a monitoring well or (4) geothermal heat exchange well, without first filing a written application to do so with the Department, and receiving and retaining a valid permit as provided herein”.

Note this fact; A well permit application was issued for 44135 Perryman Lane, AKA Record of Survey 53/47 par 3 APN # 571-030-037

On 2/26/1990 an application for a well driller's permit was submitted to Riverside County Environmental Health (hereafter the DEH) for APN #571-030-037 AKA Deborah St Pierre's property. (EXHIBIT 34)
The following day 2/27/1990 a well driller's permit was issued for exclusive use on what would eventually become Robert Franko and Deborah St Pierre's property, see the overhead of APN# 571-030-037. (EXHIBIT 35)

In 1989 the State of California Water resource control board adopted a model well ordinance. Known as 13801 of the CA Water Code Section 1.1 thereby it states the mission of the board:
quote "1, Purpose and definitions: 1.1 INTENT OF ORDNANCE:
It is the purpose of this general welfare of the people of the State of California by ensuring that the ground waters of this state will not be polluted or contaminated. To this end, minumn requirements are contained in this ordinance for construction, reconstruction, repair, and destruction of water wells, cathodic production wells and monitoring well" The document incorporated a schedule for well permitting.

At Section #2,
"2 Permits 2.1 Permit Applications: 2.1.1 When Required: No person shall dig, bore, drill, deepen, modify, repair, or destroy a water well, monitoring well or any other excavation that may intersect ground water without first applying for and receiving a permit as provided in this ordinance unless exempted by law" end quote. Does CA water laws apply to Reed's well?

Grants of Easement #2 facts,

4/13/1990 Charles Campbell signed a grant of easement for 44100 Ginger Circle and after the words, start quote "This deed for grant of easement April 12, 1990, by Charles and Joann Campbell to" end quote; Weber Heights Non-profit was not named anywhere within those granted rights, (EXHIBIT 10). As so noted, the benefactors of real property rights run appurtenant to land as shown in EXHIBIT (A) and there was not one mention of a Weber anything, therefore, moot Weber Valley Heights. Why and what does that mean other than the non-profit was excluded as a benefactor having rights to enjoy the granted rights.
It is undeniable on 5/24/1990 the Grant of Easement by Charles Campbell was recorded as document #191167. However taking note of that legal procedure per CA Civil Code being named in the return mail to area of a Grant of Easement did not entitle that named association as having benefactor rights of enjoyment to those being legally transferred as per the documents therein after the words "grants" and "to".

4/1/1990 County of Riverside ORDINANCE NO. 682 and CA Water Code 13801 were not followed when Lynch Quality Wells CO whom drilled a new "domestic use" well at 44100 Ginger Circle. That new well was erroneously said to be located within that parcel that permit #16245 was granted for use on. The 2 problems are, 1. that well drilled at 44135 Perryman Lane where permit #16245 was issued for use at did not produce a working water well. 2. The properties were never one of the same APN's as seen on the permit #16245. See the locations map, (Exhibit 36).

Because the first two wells failed to produce water what really happened was an un-permitted well was thereafter drilled at APN 571-040-002 and it did produce a 9 gallon per minute working well. The fact is 44100 Ginger Circle APN #571-040-002 was not legally permitted as a location to drill a new well.
Therefore County of Riverside ordinance 682 and CA Water code section 13801 Permit 2.1 Permit Application 2.1.1 when required should apply to Reed's well.

Additionally for many years the DEH may have believed the well located at 44240 East Benton Hemet, CA was owned by the defunct Weber Heights Non-profit Association and that it was located at 44135 Perryman Lane. Look at this picture, it is the well located at 44240 East Benton RD, (Exhibit 37). That pictured well house is not now, and never was legally any portion of 44135 Perryman Lane, AKA Mrs. Deborah St Pierre and Mr. Robert Franko's real property address.

Why did DEH inspection reports (from 2005 to 2013) related to two separate and distinct well real property locations continuously name the location as 44135 Perryman Lane. Try to answer the "why" question, was it fraud? Remember this single fact, there is not a working well at that Perryman lane property and there never was an owner known as Weber Valley Heights of that property.

In 1985 44240 East Benton was AKA Mr. Charles Reed Jr's property APN 571-040-004 as shown on the 1968 Record of Survey 53/40 parcel #4. For many years it seems as if the DEH officials may have thought they were inspecting a well on parcel #571-030-037 AKA 44135 Perryman Lane when in all reality, they were inspecting APN #571-040-004 that well is truly located at 44240 East Benton Rd. South East corner as seen and described in the 1985 Mr. Charlie Reed's grant of easement real property location, (Exhibit 1). No matter how you draw the picture, the DEH officials could not have inspected something that does not now and did not exist at 44135 Perryman Lane as shown on the well driller permit application submitted on 2/26/1990 that resulted in that permit #16245 being issued on 2/27/1990 as seen in exhibits incorporated hereto.

This map is on file with the DEH and the fact remains that after May 1,1990 a new and un-permitted well was illegally drilled at 44100 Ginger Circle APN# 571-040-002. Then in 1992, for the first time, a permanent pump was installed in the well on parcel 571-040-002 thereby completing the domestic well drilled by Lynch wells CO. (Exhibit 38).

Grants of Easement #3

On 9/11/1992 Ronald Mark Leuschen signed a road and water tank "Grant of Easement" # 227694 thereby he was creating rights to and for a new water storage system. The grant was recorded on 4/16/1993 the tank is pictured here, (EXHIBIT 39). Mr. Ronald Mark Leuschen did not grant rights to the entity known as one Weber anything anywhere within the legally recorded and documented easement rights.

CA CIVIL CODE SECTION 654, 657
The ownership of a thing is the right of one or more persons to possess and use it to the exclusion of others. In this Code, the thing of which there may be ownership is called property.

657. Property is either:
l. Real or immovable; or,
2. Personal or movable.

Title 22 CA Safe Drinking Water Act Chapter 14

Section 64211. Permit Requirement. (c) A change in ownership of a state small water system shall require the submission of a new application.
64215. Water Supply Requirements. Prior to receiving permit approval, a state small water system which was not in existence on November 12,1991 shall demonstrate to the local health officer that sufficient water is available from the water system's sources and distribution storage facilities to supply a minimum of three gallons per minute for at least 24 hours for each service connection served by the system.

Where are the test results and records of any tests showing an address of 44100 Ginger Circle for APN 571-040-002?

64216. Mutual Associations Prohibited. No state small water system which was not in existence on November 12, 1991 shall be issued a permit to operate.

The following document provides proof a joint ownership of a common interest water system was created after 11/12/1991.

On 4/16/1993 Mr. Ronald Mark Leuschen recorded explicit rights for use to his real property. Not one usage right named Weber Valley Heights Water Association as a benefactor. Why was WVHWA granted a permit to operate something it does not own as a third and independent party? Was fraud involved?

July 2002 a newly formed Association took shape thereby calling itself "Weber Valley Heights Water Association", it had new, yet very similar bylaws to the original 1973 defunct Weber Heights Non-profit Association.

On 7/13/2002 that "revised" new Association bylaws clearly showed a new name and its status of "non-profit" was thereby removed.

After 7/13/2002 that original defunct non-profit mutual benefit association completely failed to exist, (EXHIBIT 41). The recently changed land owners had formed a completely new mutual benefit association having new bylaws thereby reverting back to the California Safe Water Act, 64216 Mutual Association Prohibited after 11/12/1991.

Why did DEH issue that newly formed association a permit #1790 to operate?

One line at the bottom of the next exhibit letter provides proof there was a new and second association, (EXHIBIT 42). That letter states "We will be on our own again" and it was addressed to the DEH by Mrs. Deborah St Pierre. The meaning behind that quote implied they were on their own without the DEH intervention before they revised and created that newly named mutual benefit association.

Sometime in 2003 the two following maps that are on file with DEH provided an accurate number of water supply hook-ups, map 1 and map 2 the maps show that two completely separate systems existed in 2003. (EXHIBIT 43) Jumping forward in time that document (EXHIBIT 40) written by Mrs. Deborah St Pierre also claims only three hook-up to two separate systems as was noted that then existed.

Some basic facts related to the Association.

With the 1973 Weber Heights Non-profit Association bylaws in hand compare them to those acting and revised 2002 WVHWA bylaws in the other hand. There are two similar but different names of associations having similar yet completely different bylaws see page 1, 2. and page 3 of the 1973 bylaws, (EXHIBIT 44). You'll see as of 9/11/2004 Weber Heights Non-profit Association was no longer the name, it changed to Weber Valley Heights Water Association page 1 and page 2, (EXHIBIT 45).

The newly formed union of Weber Valley Heights Water Association held a meeting for elections of officers on 9-11-2004 and Mrs. Deborah St Pierre was elected President of WVHWA in 2004; she failed her fiduciary duty to the association on 9/11/ 2006 by not calling for an election of a new board as required by the revised 2002 association bylaws, (EXHIBIT 45).

As of 9/12/2006, the incumbent board representing Weber Valley Heights Water Association no longer existed.

Mrs. Deborah St Pierre charade started 9/12/2006. Assets of the non-incumbent association (finical accounts) continued to be controlled by the past president. She, in her own mind, may have seemed to think she remained the association President even after failing to uphold the required association bylaws for election. Her actions lasted from 9/11/2006 until 1/14/2012.

Not one meeting of the newly formed 2004 Association was held between 2005 and 2012.

All legal documents representing that newly formed revised 2002 association that were signed after 9/11/ 2006 by Deborah St Pierre, whereas she was claiming to be President of WVHWA, were in fact signed by means of deception, (EXHIBIT 46). According to County of Riverside Ordinance 682 the State Small Water Board Permit #1790 should be revoked because of misleading information provided by the permittee. The fact is: Deborah St Pierre's elected term as President of that second Association had expired 9/11/2006. Her new title any time thereafter midnight on 9/11/2006 was ex-President elect. The termination timeline of the ex-President elect status was governed according to those 2002 WVHWA bylaws.

Every single time thereafter 9/11/2006 whereas Mrs. Deborah St Pierre claimed she was president of the association she in fact was falsifying documents and that includes those addressed to DEH whereas she was officially claiming to be that President of WVHWA..

Many years later in July 2010 Deborah St Pierre took it upon herself to fulfill a twisted plan to stop Beverly Heath from using her entitled and recorded rights to easements. She, Deborah St Pierre spent unauthorized money from the property owners funds in order for her to get legal advice from the Attorney Alec Hershey, 901 S State St, Hemet CA 92543. I, Greg Reed attended that meeting at the attorney’s office along with Deborah St Pierre, the fact is; Alec Hershey told both of us, that the association being a standalone business known by the name of Weber Valley Heights Water Association did not own any rights of authority or rights to control use of the easements rights so granted and his exact statement was "absent be the norm" as seen in the easements.

The following provable facts followed that meeting,

On 7/7/2010 Deborah St Pierre only somewhat related her fact findings mission as explained by the Attorney Alec Hershey, (EXHIBIT 47).

Deborah St Pierre crime wave started after the meeting.

On 4/15/2010 Deborah sent a letter to Beverly Heath, (EXHIBIT 48).
Then on 4/19/2010 Deborah St Pierre by her own hand wrote what her motive was, "This member making money the use of our water", (EXHIBIT 49).
She had written a letter to DEH whereas she claimed 4/23/2010 3 services connections from Reed’s well was the total, (EXHIBIT 50). However when compared to the DEH emergency response files from 2007 she lied and claimed 6 connection per well existed. She had forgotten her own lie and probably figured the files were gone forever.

Deborah St Pierre using USPS demanded a real property owner Beverly Heath to follow her, Deborah St Pierre's demand or the legally appurtenant granted recorded rights to easements belonging to Beverly Heath that run as an appurtenance of her land would be denied by the defunct Weber Valley Heights Water Association.(EXHIBIT 51)

8/10/2010 Deborah St Pierre claimed "We won't be in the state small water system next year", (EXHIBIT 52).
8/12/2010 Deborah St Pierre wrote motive #2 "This member is making a lot of money off our water".

Deborah St Pierre sent out ballots that failed to conform to CA Corp. Code and it was not authorized at a meeting or by a ballot sent to rights of easement owners.
8/12/2010 Deborah St Pierre delivered, by mail, a ballot without a time for return asking should members uphold bylaws. (EXHIBIT 53)
The land owner named Hess voted and Deborah St Pierre shared the tabulated ballot results having counted the Hess vote a valid. However the Hess property is NOT listed as a benefactor of the grants of easement rights, therefore one needs to ask, why did the Hess opinion count for anything related to the easement owners business. (EXHIBIT 54)

I saw this following letter as an attempt to extort Mrs. Beverly Heath into complying with Deborah St Pierre's wishes, (EXHIBIT 55).

Mrs. Beverly Heath owns rights to the wells and rights to the water storage easement. Mrs. Deborah St Pierre knew the union as a singular fictitious business did not own any rights to the well. She had been informed by an Attorney that the Association did not own rights to either of the wells. I was there I know what the Attorney told the two of us.
8/23/2010 It was Deborah St Pierre claiming to be President who wrote and sent the "Notice of intention to terminate water service", (EXHIBIT 56).

The ballots she, Deborah St Pierre sent by mail never mentioned "termination of water services.” As mentioned the singular Association did not and does not own rights to say how water is or is not used. Without merit Mrs. Deborah St Pierre claimed Heath was using water commercially. The 2002 revised bylaws state the water rights shall run with the land. Try to answer what documents gave Weber Valley Heights Water Association CA Civil Rights to determine how water is or was used?

8/25/2010 thank you for voting. (EXHIBIT 57)

Where are the correct property addresses within the DEH Inspection Reports from 2005 to 2015?

9/1/2010 The DEH water inspection note the total hookups to the water system, (EXHIBIT 58).
9/1/2010 pg 2, (EXHIBIT 59).
9/11/2010 legally connected properties map, (EXHIBIT 60).

More Deceptions by Deborah St Pierre

9/13/2010 See this brief, Deborah St Pierre and Dan Spears severed an appurtenant water supply pipeline embedded in real property not belonging to the past and failed non-profit association, (EXHIBIT 61).
9/27/2010 Deborah St Pierre sent a ballot trying to terminate Reed's water service, (EXHIBIT 62).
10/14/2010 Deborah St Pierre provided false information to a Riverside County Sheriff, (EXHIBIT 62).
11/30/2010 Without easement owner's voted or written approval, Deborah St Pierre took it upon herself and spent unauthorized funds at attorney Best, Best and Krieger. (EXHIBIT 63)
11/2/2010 Deborah St Pierre planned to expand the rights granted within the 1990 Grant of easement, (EXHIBIT 64).
12/3/2010 Deborah St Pierre spent un-authorized sums of money for Deborah St Pierre's personal research goals, (EXHIBIT 65).
1/2/2011 Deborah St Pierre provides proof she believed the ballot was to completely terminate Heath's water, (EXHIBIT 66). The ballot stated uphold bylaws, the word terminate was not mentioned once on the illegal ballot. On January 11, 2011 Deborah St Pierre continued her non authorized spending spree without consideration of her actions.

9/5/2011. This document provides absolute proof of what I called an attempted extortion as I saw it, (EXHIBIT 67).
Mrs. Deborah St Pierre provided in writing, "if she'd (Mrs. Beverly Heath,) complied with the terms of the disconnect notice, she would have approached W.V.H.A members and told us that she was pulling the marijuana plants and ask us not to terminate".

The motives may have been revealed. The underlying reasoning behind the termination was in fact to make Mrs. Beverly Heath remove marijuana plants embedded in her legally owned real property Record of Survey 53/43 parcel #4.

2/3/2012 Deborah St Pierre still claiming to be President of the failed association called for a group of people to attend a garage meeting held at Dan Spears property, (EXHIBIT 68).

Deborah St Pierre’s charade continued by her claiming to be the President of a defunct association, she maintained her lies up to 1/14/2012 and even on that date she claimed proclaimed she was the President calling a meeting to order. The last meeting was held September 11, 2004 as of September 11, 2006 that elected board of association went defunct .

On 1/14/2012 a new group of people consisting of both renters and real property owners convened, (EXHIBIT 69).

That group consisted of,
•Property owner Dan Spears, book/map 53/53 parcel -1
•Property owner Debbie St. Pierre, Bob Franko book/map 53/47 parcel -2 and 3
•Property owner Sherry Reed parcel 53/40 parcel book/map 53/40 parcel -2
•Property owner Leroy and Janice Smith book/map 53/51 parcel -1
•Property owner Gary Boer book/map 53/43 parcel -2
•Property owner Jeff Hall book/map 53/53 parcel -4
•Property renter, Eric Schaumberger, had seconded votes. He was a renter and not an easement rights owner.
•Property renter, Tina Ziegler, was also a non-easement right owner.

CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 12460-12466. (b) A regular meeting of members shall be held annually.
The Minutes from last meeting held on 9/11/2004 were dispersed and discussed, (EXHIBIT 70).

No bylaws were adapted for the new group consisting of both real property rights owners and the property renter who moved motions as noted by Tina Ziegler whom somehow without a vote was appointed as a temporary Secretary. The meeting on January 14, 2012 adjourned at 2:10 pm. That day a new group was formed without bylaws and without a new name. Two previous association's existed, one being Weber Heights Non-profit Association and the other association was known as Weber Valley Heights Water Association however that association was no longer functioning as a valid unincorporated associations that was following those 2002 revised bylaws after September 11, 2006.

Is illegally drilling a well without the required permit considered a legal purpose?

18035. (a) "Unincorporated association" means an unincorporated group of two or more persons joined by mutual consent for a common lawful purpose, whether organized for profit or not.
18100. The interest of a member in an unincorporated association is personal property.
18105. An unincorporated association may, in its name, acquire, hold, manage, encumber, or transfer an interest in real or personal property.
18110. Property acquired by or for an unincorporated association is property of the unincorporated association and not of the members individually.
18115. The acquisition, transfer, or encumbrance of an interest in real property by an unincorporated association shall be executed by its president and secretary or other comparable officers, or by a person specifically designated by a resolution adopted by the association, or by a committee or other body or person authorized to act by the governing principles of the association.
CA Corp. Code TITLE 3 UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS 18410. An unincorporated association may be dissolved by any of the following methods :
(c) If the association's operations have been discontinued for at least three years, by the board or, if the association has no incumbent board.
(d) If the association's operations have been discontinued, by court order.

These questions remain unanswered

1. How did control of property rights transfer to the union Weber Heights water association without a legally recorded record and documentation granting rights of authority?
2. By what legal documents are any management rights granted to the standalone Association as a whole?
3. After looking at the 1968 through 1969 official records of survey, how did an illegally drilled well on APN 571-040-002 get approved as part of a State Small Water system by the DEH?

Was it by means of deception and frauds?
Maybe the DEH thought the water source well was actually on APN 571-030-037 as was shown on well driller's permit #16245, or was it DEH that was lied to by the failed non-profit association past members for over 20 years?

Within the Association bylaws, how did a member become a member of either association?

In common rights authorized in the Grants of Easements run as an appurtenance to those lands related to the property named in each Exhibit (A) per the separately recorded grants of easement and those rights do not come with a membership in WVHWA.

What legally recorded document granted the WVHWA real property control and/or rights of authority control?

What document provides real property ownership rights that somehow automatically granted membership rights into the two failed associations according to bylaws?

If a membership in an association is personal property , how did the personal property right of membership transfer with real property rights when membership rights are not transferable?

_______________________________________________________________________________

CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 12460-12466. (b) A regular meeting of members shall be held annually.
18035. (a) "Unincorporated association" means an unincorporated group of two or more persons joined by mutual consent

for a common lawful purpose, whether organized for profit or not.

CIVIL CODE SECTION 657
657. Property is either:
l. Real or immovable; or,
2. Personal or movable.
_______________________________________________________________________________

Closing remarks,

9/11/2004, as mentioned before and within this complaint, Mrs. Deborah St Pierre was elected into the office of President in order to represent WVHWA.
On 9/11/2006 her term in office expired. She had failed her fiduciary duty to call for a board meeting and elections prior to 9-11-2006. On 9-12-2006 the Association was defunct and without the required officers as stated in WVHWA 2002 revised bylaws. From 9/12/2006 to 1/18/2012 not one additional election was ever called.

5/21/2007 On the DEH form "Water System Emergency/Disaster Personnel and Responsibilities" by fraud Deborah St Pierre did in fact claim she was the acting President and Treasurer of the association and there was not a Secretary. She lied on that form. As stated in the 2002 revised bylaws, all officers need to be voted as such and the term was for two years and not a day more. Again, one meeting in 2004 and the next was in 2012. What association? Her term in office expired on

9/11/2006. Therefore any and all actions by Mrs. Deborah St Pierre whereas she claimed such actions were for or on behalf of the Association after the date of 9/12/2006, were in fact a lie. As in CA civil code SECTION 3294-3296 She had no rights of authority in her tort actions of Mrs. Beverly Heath.

11/29/2011 Mrs. Deborah St Pierre claimed as the respondent in Heath V. St Pierre . (EXHIBIT 71)
She, Mrs. Deborah St Pierre may have in fact perjured herself CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 2009-2015.6 by claiming to be "President" of that defunct Association. (EXHIBIT 71 page 2 line 24) I keep remembering and coming back to this single point of interest fact, her elected term in office as President had long since expired; it was from 9/11/2004 to 9/11/2006.
Within that same brief Exhibit 71 there are many other claims that are untrue and absolute perjury of facts.

Another fact, Mrs. Deborah St Pierre additionally perjured herself with each and every single signing of official DEH documents after 9/12/2006 whereas she still claimed herself as having title of WVHWA President.

The well driller's permit #16245 issued 2/27/1990 in the name of Weber Heights association was not valid for use at 44100 Ginger Circle, APN# 571-040-002 as shown on the officially recorded Records of Survey 53/40 as parcel #2. The 1969 Records of Survey 53/47 provides proof APN # 571-030-037 parcel #3 AKA 44135 Perryman Lane and APN# 571-040-002 53/40 AKA 44100 Ginger Circle were never one of the same properties prior to or thereafter 12/20/1968 therefore, permit #16245 was not issued as a valid permit to any groundwater source located at 44100 Ginger Circle as in the Reed's well. The association being a single union as shown CA corp. Code 18000 to 18420 does not own my real property or the rights to manage my real property or the water therefrom.

CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 18115. The acquisition, transfer, or encumbrance of an interest in real property by an unincorporated association shall be executed by its president and secretary or other comparable officers, or by a person specifically designated by a resolution adopted by the association, or by a committee or other body or person authorized to act by the governing principles of the association.

The facts are: three (3) separate and completely different Grants of Easement provided 13 totally separate interest real properties appurtenant rights that run with the land. Those interests in common right are for the benefit of said land as provided in exhibit (A) of the recorded grant of easement rights. These are 3 entirely separate yet distinct and legally recorded grants of easement entitled rights. Not one of the easements granted any rights of enjoyment to the failed and defunct Weber Heights Non-profit Association.

EVIDENCE CODE SECTION 410. As used in this chapter, "direct evidence" means evidence that directly proves a fact, without an inference or presumption, and which in itself, if true, conclusively establishes that fact.

CORPORATIONS CODE SECTION 12460-12466. (b) A regular meeting of members shall be held annually. One meeting held on 9-11-2004 and another held on January 18, 2012 is not what would be called regular.CA Corp Code Section 18035. (a) "Unincorporated association" means an unincorporated group of two or more persons joined by mutual consent for a common lawful purpose, whether organized for profit or not.
1. Illegally drilling a well is not a lawful purpose. RIV CO ORD. 682 and CA Water Code 13801
2. Without a legally issued building permit, running over 1000 foot of 220 voltage wires and illegally burring it is not a lawful purpose. Riverside County Building and Safety Code.

CA Corp Code 5223. (a) The superior court of the proper county may, at the suit of a director, or twice the authorized number (Section 5036) of members or 20 members, whichever is less, remove from office any director in case of fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of authority or discretion with reference to the corporation or breach of any duty arising under Article 3 (commencing with Section 5230) of this chapter, and may bar from reelection any director so removed for a period prescribed by the court. The corporation shall be made a party to such action. (b) The Attorney General may bring an action under subdivision (a), may intervene in such an action brought by any other party and shall be given notice of any such action brought by any other party.

County of Riverside Ordinance 682 at Section 6 states EXPIRATION OR EXTENSION OF PERMIT
A. Each permit issued pursuant to this ordinance shall expire and become null and void if the work authorized thereby has not been completed within six (6) months following the issuance of the permit. Well driller permit #16245 did not produce a working water well on the property the permit was issued for use on therefore it is null and void.

Section 7 PERMIT REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION. A. The Director may revoke or suspend a permit issued pursuant to this ordinance upon a finding that: 1. A determination of violation exists. B. A permit violation exists where any of the following conditions are present: 1.) The permit was issued in error. 2.) The permit was issued on the basis of incorrect information supplied by the permittee. State Small Water Board Permit #1790 is somehow based on well driller permit #16245 therefore, it too should be revoked according to County of Riverside Ordinance 682 at Section 7 B. (A) and (B) shown above.

I hereby and respectfully ask the DEH to take action and please revoke that State Small Water Board permit #1790 issued in the name of a defunct, fictitious, and non-existing other than by a fictitious business name that is without legal entitlement rights of authority.

Note this fact: The February 27, 1990 well driller permit #16245 is not now, nor was it ever, in any way related to Reed's well location APN 571-040-002 AKA 1968 record of Survey 53/40 parcel #2. As herein stated, the location of use for well driller permit #16245 did not produce a working water well at 44135 Perryman Lane APN# 571-030-037 1969 RECORD OF SURVEY 53/47 parcel 37 as shown on the permit application dated February 26, 1990 therefore, it should be considered void.

Why do the past the DEH well inspection reports from 2005 to 2010 name 44135 Perryman Lane as the location? Was fraud involved? The true addresses of the wells are Haden’s well at 44240 East Benton Rd and Reed’s well at 44100 Ginger Circle.

Based on facts therefore revealed within documentation listed and named herein, I hereby ask the DEH request the County of Riverside Attorney General to please review the facts included in this case and call a grand jury to investigate all of the frauds and illegal activates named herein as mentioned within this investigation and discoveries. The three grants of easements and my grant deed provide 100% proof Weber Heights Non-profit Association and or Weber Valley Heights Water Association does not and did not own rights of entitlement for usage or rights to control the granted easement rights, nor did or does the Association, as a standalone union, have any rights to use or control use of my real or personal property.

That State Small Water Board permit #1790 is issued in the name of a fictitious defunct Weber Valley Heights Association. Somehow and for some unknown reason the well driller permit #16245 and SSWB permit #1790 were under false pretenses incorrectly related to the well that is appurtenant my real property now known as Reed's well. As proven herein the DEH made decisions based on frauds that were presented to DEH by one of the defunct as of 9-11-2006 association member who continued claiming she was the "President" 9/12/2006 to 1/14/2012.

Conclusion,

I have without question and according to the records submitted herein proven the State Small Water Board permit #1790 and well driller permit #16245 are not related to my property. Seemingly and for unknown reasoning the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health has mistaken and thereby related my real property rights as somehow belonging to a defunct yet dysfunctional Weber Valley Heights Water Association.

Who is the makeup of Weber Valley Heights Water Association?

Those persons acting as a business calling itself "Weber Valley Heights Water Association" remains in violation of CA Business and Professions Code section 17900-17930 specifically at section 17910.

The fact is: My address is commonly known as 44100 Ginger Circle Hemet CA 92544 AKA Record of Survey 53/40 APN 571-040-002, as was conveyed by a Grant deed officially recorded April 25,2007.

Not one officially recorded County record related to my property granted a "Weber anything" benefactor of enjoyment rights for use to or of my real property. (SEE EXHIBIT 1)

I hereby and respectfully, not only request, but absolutely and without question demand DEH officials to disassociate 44100 Ginger Circle from any permit issued to, for, and/or in the name of Weber Heights non-profit Association and/or Weber Valley Heights Water Association.

Hereinafter, I request DEH declare well driller permit #16245, that never manifested a water producing well appurtenant to 44135 Perryman lane Record of Survey 53/47 par 3 APN #571-030-037 be declared and thereafter known as null and void.

According to Riverside County Ordinance 682 Section 6. EXPIRATION OR EXTENSION OF PERMIT. A. Each permit issued pursuant to this ordinance shall expire and become null and void if the work authorized thereby has not been completed within six (6) months following the issuance of the permit. Thereby RIV CO ORD 682 the well driller permit #16245 is void.

Furthermore I request that SSWB Permit #1790 be revoked in accordance with County of Riverside Ordinance 682 Section 7,
PERMIT REVOCATION OR SUSPENSION.
A. The Director may revoke or suspend a permit issued pursuant to this ordinance upon a finding that:
1. A determination of violation exists.
B. A permit violation exists where any of the following conditions are present:
1. The permit was issued in error.
2. The permit was issued on the basis of incorrect information supplied by the permittee.

As per CA evidence code section 500 except as otherwise provided by law, a party has the burden of proof as to each fact the existence or nonexistence of which is essential to the claim for relief or defense that he is asserting. Multiple facts presented herein have proven "Frauds happened" and DEH issued permits based on incorrect information and some of those frauds are beyond a shadow of doubt proven herein.

Thank you.